Article #4
1999
 
 
 
Newsletter list 

Newsletter 

Previous Article 

Next Article 


 
 
 
 


Extension of Probabilistic Mental Models

Mike Doherty
Bowling Green, OH

Gigerenzer and his colleagues have raised a fundamental issue about vicarious functioning, viz., whether the mechanism is cue integration or cue substitution.

The mechanism of cue integration is assumed implicitly in the use of regression models and often made explicitly, as well, in discussing judgment behavior. The assumption that it is cue substitution is explicit in the family of PMM models.

Below is the abstract of a paper (Slegers, Brake & Doherty, "Probabilistic Mental Models with Continuous Predictors") just accepted by OBHDP.

Gigerenzer and his colleagues have sought to develop psychologically plausible models of human judgment. Their models are classified as ones of bounded rationality based on a principle of one-reason decision making. The models associated with the theory of Probabilistic Mental Models (PMM) have been developed for tasks in which all predictors are binary.

This paper extends PMM to the case of continuous predictors. The current model employs the limitation on the number of categories people use in making absolute judgments along a single perceptual dimension (7 2, Miller, 1956). The algorithm transforms each continuous predictor to be consistent with this limitation, then implements a step-down one-reason decision procedure similar to previous PMM models.

Like previous PMM models, the 7 2 model predicts binary judgments as well as a multiple regression model. However, the model does not successfully predict the probability judgments of individual participants, which is also true of other models in the literature.

Contact Mike Doherty

Previous Article                Next Article

Newsletter list